Who invented the 22 250

Nevertheless, when it came time for Winchester to adopt a new high velocity. The dejected Watkyns continued to work on his wildcat, which was originally called the Swift. It was about this time that Watkyns began working with gunsmith Jerry Gebby who had been experimenting with the. Finally a design decision was reached and Gebby copyrighted the design as the ". Because the name "Varminter" had been copyrighted, gunsmiths wanting to build rifles for the hot new.

Still more trouble occurred in when Remington introduced their. The only cartridge that threatened the popularity of the. Finally in Browning decided to chamber rifles for the wildcat. That step was all that was needed and in Remington officially adopted the wildcat as the. Performance The. This cartridge is best suited to game weighing up to 40kg 90lb and up to a safe maximum of 60kg lb.

Heavier game of up to 80kg lb require very careful shot placement. The ultra velocity. Readers are referred to the. If you find the resources on this website to be valuable, we would be sincerely grateful if you would consider making a donation to help us cover the costs of the website and to assist us to continue our research and testing into the future.

It doesn't matter whether your donation is big or small - it makes all the difference! In Phil Sharpe, one of the first gunsmiths to build a rifle for the. He insisted that it kept the powder burning in the case rather than in the throat of the rifle, as well as prevented case stretching and neck thickening.

Accuracy was consistently excellent, with little need for either case trimming or neck reaming, and Sharpe pronounced it "my choice for the outstanding cartridge development of the past decade.

This was a risky yet historical move on Browning's part as there was no commercial production of the. John T. Amber, reporting on the development of the Browning rifle in the Gun Digest , called the event "unprecedented. Two years later in Remington Arms adopted the. The cartridge was used by the Australian Special Air Service for urban counter-terrorism duties in the s, in an attempt to reduce excessive penetration and ricochets. Typical factory-loaded.

Later, it would be chambered in the. For many years, it was the only other non-Weatherby cartridge to be accorded that honor. Everyone who makes a varmint rifle offers it, and every ammunition maker has it in the lineup. It is the most successful centerfire. Lovers of the. Shooters of the. So how, you ask, can the. Simple: Longevity. It has more than sufficient velocity combined with excellent accuracy and a personality like a golden retriever.

This is a wildcat that forced both rifle-makers and ammunition companies to sit up and take notice because it was just too good to ignore. Over the. However, Philip B. Sharpe was around at the time and knew the principals involved. He was a fanatical rifleman and ballistician, and took an obsessive interest in anything to do with rifles.

According to Sharpe, the initial work on the design was done by Capt. Grosvenor Wotkyns, a ballistician who worked as a consultant to Winchester.

Wotkyns was one of the designers of the. In the mids there were very few factory smallbores around--the Hornet,. All had rims, and all left something to be desired in the new bolt-actions that were rapidly gaining favor.

There was a frenzy of wildcatting going on, with cartridges being necked up, down and sideways as every rifle nut worthy of the name tried to come up with the ultimate. Most of these developments have long since been forgotten, justifiably so. Grove Wotkyns approached the problem scientifically with the goal of developing the best-balanced, most ballistically efficient.

While others played around with the. There followed several years' work, experimenting to determine every aspect, from case taper to shoulder angle to neck length. Rifle after rifle was chambered, tested and discarded while Wotkyns made notes. According to the original plan, when development was completed the cartridge was to be adopted by Winchester as a factory round. At this point the facts become cloudy. Winchester did indeed introduce a high-velocity.

But instead of the. No one knows. The records are lost, the principals are dead, memories are dimmed. Understandably infuriated--he later refused to discuss the Swift--Wotkyns continued work on his brainchild, drawing in a noted handloader, J.

Bushnell Smith, and a gunsmith and shooting champion, Jerry Gebby. Together they perfected the ". That was in Phil Sharpe became involved when Gebby built him a rifle for the new cartridge. Since by this time Sharpe had been working with Winchester's new Swift for more than two years, he was in a good position to judge the.

The first thing he found was that the Varminter was far more flexible than the Swift. It will handle all velocities from 1, up to 4, fps. Sharpe credited the steep degree shoulder for this performance. He insisted that it kept the powder burning in the case rather than in the throat of the rifle, as well as prevented case stretching and neck thickening.

Accuracy was consistently excellent, with little need for either case trimming or neck reaming, and Sharpe pronounced it "my choice for the outstanding cartridge development of the past decade. Alas, Sharpe--and everyone else--had a long wait. Because the name "Varminter" had been copyrighted, gunsmiths building rifles for the cartridge almost universally called it simply the. And in the ensuing quarter-century, many rifles were built with tiny chamber variations.

There were all sorts of so-called improvements and little or no standardization. Again, this was partly because of the copyrighted name and dimensions of Wotkyns's. World War II intervened, bringing cartridge development to a standstill for the better part of 10 years. It was several years after the war before rifles, ammunition and components became freely available once again.

In Remington introduced the. It exhibited none of the problems of the Swift; it was quiet and docile and extremely accurate. About this time, benchrest shooting became formalized, and the.

Its major rival in the early years, however, was the wildcat. With so much interest in the cartridge, why did it take so long for any ammunition maker, or rifle manufacturer, to make it legitimate? Part of the reason is that the.